Sign up FAST! Login

U.N. Drone Investigator: If Facts Lead to U.S. War Crimes, So Be It | Danger Room | Wired.com


U N Drone Investigator If Facts Lead to U S War Crimes So Be It Danger Room Wired com

Source: www.wired.com

Stashed in: Robots!, America!

To save this post, select a stash from drop-down menu or type in a new one:

Ben Emmerson wants to be clear: He’s not out to ban flying killer robots used by the CIA or the U.S. military. But the 49-year-old British lawyer is about to become the bane of the drones’ existence, thanks to the United Nations inquiry he launched last week into their deadly operations.

Emmerson, the United Nations’ special rapporteur for human rights and counterterrorism, will spend the next five months doing something the Obama administration has thoroughly resisted: unearthing the dirty secrets of a global counterterrorism campaign that largely relies on rapidly proliferating drone technology. Announced on Thursday in London, it’s the first international inquiry into the drone program, and one that carries the imprimatur of the world body. By the next session of the United Nations in the fall, Emmerson hopes to provide the General Assembly with an report on 25 drone strikes in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and Palestine where civilian deaths are credibly alleged.

That carries the possibility of a reckoning with the human damage left by drones, the first such witnessing by the international community. Accountability, Emmerson tells Danger Room in a Monday phone interview, “is the central purpose of the report.” He’s not shying away from the possibility of digging up evidence of “war crimes,” should the facts point in that direction. But despite the Obama administration’s secrecy about the drone strikes to date, he’s optimistic that the world’s foremost users of lethal drone tech will cooperate with him.

I wonder why he's so optimistic that they'll cooperate.

what else could he say?

He could say that he doubts they'll cooperate but that won't stop him.

He could, I imagine that it would start the investigation off on the wrong foot though.  

I guess it's more productive to be optimistic at the beginning.

You May Also Like: