I've often heard in Silicon Valley that success in one area of life -- e.g. team sports -- is somehow predictive of success in others -- e.g. entrepreneurship. Is there any evidence that this is true, beyond simple class bias? I was personally raised in a more traditional belief system which posited that it was hubristic for any individual to ask for too many gifts from the gods... e.g. excellence in business almost guaranteed an unhappy personal life and vice versa.

Athletes get better jobs: http://www.bakadesuyo.com/do-athletes-get-better-jobs And make better managers: http://www.bakadesuyo.com/do-former-athletes-make-better-managers

More to your point, you can look at it like a war between deliberate practice (mastery/specialization) and diversity of skills/experience. If you spend the 10,000 hours it's theorized you need to become an expert at something, you're most likely going to be lacking in other areas -- or you're going to be really old. On the other hand, and this is relevant to your point and to the athletic analogy, some skills are transferable, like leadership: http://www.bakadesuyo.com/are-leadership-skills-transferable

So the question may be how different are the two areas *really*? If they're both heavy on management and leadership (people skills), then maybe it's not too much to ask to be a great athlete and a great entrepreneur...

@ifindkarma Everything takes hard work and attitude :) In all areas of life <3