Sign up FAST! Login

OF COURSE Google would have paid more than $19 billion for WhatsApp if given the chance.

Stashed in: Facebook!, Sequoia, internet, Snapchat, Larry Page, WhatsApp!

To save this post, select a stash from drop-down menu or type in a new one:

Half a billion users of ANYTHING is still very rare.

So I'm pulling this part out of the previous post:

Jay Yarow summarizes The Information:

Page was willing to pay more than the $19 billion Facebook paid for WhatsApp, according to a new report from Amir Efrati and Jessica Lessin at The Information

But WhatsApp's founders turned down Google because they believed the only reason Page was bidding on WhatsApp was to keep it out of Facebook's hands. 

Efrati and Lessin say that days before WhatsApp closed its deal with Facebook, Page made a pitch: Come to Google. You'll be able to keep the company independent. You're a threat to Facebook. 

That pitch wasn't good enough. WhatsApp decided to go with Facebook.

When Page heard that WhatsApp wasn't interested, he started talking to WhatsApp investor Sequoia. He made it clear that he would outbid Facebook.

It was all for naught. The WhatsApp guys went to Facebook. They thought that Facebook had a better grasp on what they were doing. And, apparently, they felt Page was only interested in WhatsApp as a way to hurt Facebook.

For what it's worth, a source at Google told Efrati and Lessin that WhatsApp misunderstood Page. Page was merely encouraging WhatsApp to remain independent.

Two reasons why this is even worse than you think:

1. Sequoia was an investor in Google and they still didn't help Google. 

2. Facebook snubbed Sequoia long ago...

...but Sequoia helped Facebook anyway. 

Mark Zuckerberg pajamas Sequoia Made On WhatsApp - Business Insider

Smartphones and tablets are only getting bigger over the next decade:

Price Per User For WhatsApp - Business Insider

Why $19 billion was a bargain:

Price Per User For WhatsApp - Business Insider

You May Also Like: