Reza Aslan on What the New Atheists Get Wrong -- Science of Us
Jared Sperli stashed this in life
Stashed in: Religion, Values, Your argument is invalid., Atheists, Religion
People bring their values TO religion, not the other way around:
I think the principle fallacy of not just to the so-called New Atheists, but I think of a lot of critics of religion, is that they believe that people derive their values, their morals, from their religion. That, as every scholar of religion in the world will tell you, is false.
People don’t derive their values from their religion — they bring their values to their religion. Which is why religions like Judaism, Hinduism, Christianity, [and] Islam, are experienced in such profound, wide diversity. Two individuals can look at the exact same text and come away with radically different interpretations. Those interpretations have nothing to do with the text, which is, after all, just words on a page, and everything to do with the cultural, nationalistic, ethnic, political prejudices and preconceived notions that the individual brings to the text. That is the most basic, logical idea that you could possibly imagine, and yet for some reason, it seems to get lost in the incredibly simplistic rhetoric around religion and the lived experience of religion.
It seems like a logical viewpoint — if you are just a person who doesn’t know much about the history, philosophy, sociology of religion — it seems like a logical thing to say that people get their values from their scriptures. It’s just intrinsically false. That’s not what happens. People do not derive their values from their scriptures — they insert their values into their scriptures.
In the United States, just two centuries ago, both slave owners and abolitionists not only used the same Bible to justify their conflicting viewpoints, they used the exact same verses. That’s the power of scripture, it’s the power of religion: It’s infinitely malleable. We do not read scriptures that were written 5000 years ago still because they’re true — we read them because they’re malleable, because they can address the ever-evolving need of a community, of an individual, because they can be shaped to whatever one’s political ideology is. You have Christians in the hills of Guatemala who view Jesus as a liberating warrior who takes up arms against the oppressor, and Christians in midwestern Chicago who believe that Jesus wants you to drive a Bentley. Who’s right? They both are! That’s why Jesus matters.
That's a great point!...and it's a pity it's not widely recognized.........I might venture, however, that the truth is somewhere in the middle. Religious texts do have some fundamental points to make; VS People can "spin" words to mean whatever they want; .........but perhaps it is somewhat of a dance between the two. The texts create some boundaries (not necessarily good ones though) and the spin pushes against those boundaries.
Reza did seem to take some of his arguments a step too far. But his first point is quite good.
It's a particularly good point because it really made me think about why I thought values come from religion. For which I have no particularly good answer.
4:21 PM Oct 15 2014